Paul Krugman’s Media Critic Impersonation: Rips Fox Biz as ‘Pro-Republican’
We’ve come to expect intellectual dishonesty from the media elite, and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, columnist for the New York Times, never disappoints.
Krugman, in a Nov. 11 post on his NYTimes.com blog titled "The agony of Fox Business," made it clear he was a subscriber to the left-wing fairy tale that Fox News, and by extension the Fox Business Channel, are not pro-business. Instead – they’re "pro-Republican."
"Clearly, the Fox Business crew is having a very hard time," Krugman wrote. "They bill themselves as being truly pro-business – not like those leftists at CNBC. But they aren’t really pro-business; they’re pro-Republican. They’d like you to believe that it’s the same thing; but there’s this awkward fact that markets have, you know, gone up under Obama."
Krugman uses a "clever gadget," also known as a Web site, which is able to calculate S&P 500 returns over periods of time. He defines those periods of time by presidential administrations and determines that based on the liberal myth that Fox is a part of the GOP, the network is bad for business because the stock market doesn’t do well under Republican administrations:
And this isn’t just a phenomenon of the last few months. Look back at stock returns under recent presidents, which is easy using a clever gadget at Political Calculations. Taking real, dividend-inclusive annual returns on the S&P 500, I get:
Reagan: 10.08%
Bush I: 10.16%
Clinton: 14.35%
Bush II: minus 5.81%
But this sort of "economic shorthand" could be applied to anything to make a partisan case, which Krugman is trying to do. Based on his same criteria, you could make the case the S&P 500 has done much better when the U.S. House of Representatives has been controlled by a Republican versus a Democrat over the same time frame:
Tip O’Neill (D) (Jan. 1981-Jan. 1987): 12.61%
Jim Wright (D) (Jan. 1987-June 1989): 7.33%
Tom Foley (D) (June 1989-Jan. 1995): 6.31%
Newt Gingrich (R) (Jan. 1995-Jan. 1999): 27.62%
Dennis Hastert (R) (Jan. 1999-Jan. 2007): 0.57%
Nancy Pelosi (D) (Jan. 2007-present): minus 11.05%
Although it’s a bogus statistic, the S&P 500 has fared much better with a Republican controlling the House, which based on Krugman’s logic makes Fox Business Channel, as he alleges is an extension of the Republican Party, the better channel.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Related posts:
- WhiteHouse.gov Plays Media Critic: Calls Krauthammer’s Washington Post Column ‘Wholly Inaccurate’
- Bozell Column: The Dede Media
- CNN’s Sanchez Misrepresents Dem Stupak’s Amend. as a ‘Conservative Republican’ Challenge to Govt Med
- CNN’s Sanchez Cites Liberal Org to Bash Republican, Omits It’s Liberal
- CNN’s Sanchez Cites Liberal Org to Bash Republican, Omits It’s Liberal
Tags: amp, Bill Clinton, Bush, Business Channel, Business Coverage, case, clever gadget, Clinton, CNBC, columnist, Conservatives & Republicans, d jan, Dennis Hastert, dishonesty, economist, economist paul krugman, economy, elite, extension, fairy tale, fox, Fox Business Network, fox news, gadget, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, intellectual dishonesty, Jan, Jim Wright, June, liberal myth, Liberals & Democrats, Media Critic, media elite, Nancy, Nancy Pelosi, Neill, new, New Gingrich, New York Times, Newt Gingrich, Nobel, Nobel Prize, o neill, Paul Krugman, presidential administrations, pro business, Quot, Republican, republican administrations, Ronald Reagan, s media, stock, Stock Market, stock returns, time, Times, Tip O'Neill, Tom Foley, U.S. House, York
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
